FOR ARCHIVAL PURPOSES ONLY

The information in this wiki hasn't been maintained for a good while. Some of the projects described have since been deprecated.

In particular, the "Ushahidi Platform v3.x" section contains information that is often misleading. Many details about this version of Platform have changed since.

This website is an extraction of the original Ushahidi wiki into a static form. Because of that, functions like logging in, commenting or searching will not work.

For more documentation, please refer to https://docs.ushahidi.com

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Provided by Chris Walker (and later extended by Robbie Mackay), providing advice on using Ushahidi in a place like Syria:

  • Create and use limited-privilege moderator accounts
  • Admins should install NoScript for Firefox or NotScripts for Chrome
  • Admin's should remain logged out as much as possible
    • Only login when you are actively reviewing reports
    • Avoid doing other tasks while reviewing reports
    • This reduces risk of various hijacking attacks
    • Always log out when you're done. Don't leave your computer logged in and unattended
  • Do not rely on the "Trusted report" feature
  • Require HTTPS
    • Train admins to check the URL and make sure the SSL certificate is valid
  • Enforce good passwords
  • Train moderators to recognize (and delete) suspicious URLs in reports
  • Train moderators carefully
  • Delete all reports that you do not intend to use
  • Have people manually scan submissions to remove personally identifiable information
  • Acknowledge and clearly explain that all SMS input is completely visible to a telco or government-level adversary
  • Do not allow the map to update in realtime (so as to avoid clearly and immediately identifying victims to perpetrators)
  • Disallowing public, Web-based write access entirely? Password-protecting even the read-only map? (Depending on your target audience, of course....)
  • It's worth reiterating that you can't have a "do no harm" philosophy without being genuinely open to the possibility of doing nothing...if you judge the risks to be serious enough